Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leigh Stein's avatar

I was still inside the feminist cult (women writers supporting women writers!) and although I didn’t moderate the YA Binders where this happened, I moderated the “main” Binders. The other mods notified me that there was a character named “Kat Rosenfield” leaking screenshots to a journalist. I said, “That’s my friend in real life. I know her. She wouldn’t do that.” I was told, “It must be so hard to learn your friend would do something like this.” I escaped four months later and am very lucky to still have Kat as my friend.

Joshua Burgin's avatar

This post reminds me of a PhD thesis I read a couple years ago on the long-term effects of public shaming and cancellation campaigns. It pointed out how the attackers and the "friends" who stayed quiet move on quickly. Everyone gets to tell themselves they were on the right side of history, or at least that their intentions were good, so whatever harm was done doesn't really count.

Meanwhile the target gets to spend the next decade being one Google search away from having some manufactured controversy dragged back into the present during a job interview, a promotion process, a relationship, or some other part of life that has nothing to do with the original accusation. And the "fact" that there was a controversy becomes proof that something bad must have happened.

Also, the "you weren't really cancelled because you still have a job" argument has always struck me as absurd. That's a standard nobody applies to any other form of reputational or professional harm.

137 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?